【18 U.S.C 2257】

If you're talking politics8 U.S.C 2257Twitter, in all likelihood you're either preaching to the choir, or letting your arguments fall on deaf, angry ears.

A study from Pew Research Center has yielded some new data about the role politics and political leanings play on Twitter. Overall, it showed that Trump's paranoia about his enemies might hold some water: 55 percent of Twitter users "strongly disapprove" of President Trump, and that contingent produces 80 percent of tweets. They're closing in!

And only a meager 15 percent of Twitter users "strongly approve" of the president which is, well, not a lot.

---

You May Also Like

---

---

One of the most interesting findings was how intensely polarized the digital landscape is: 97 percent of Twitter users who tweet about national politics either "strongly disapprove" or "strongly approve" of President Trump.

That passionate population skews (ostensibly) very liberal, too: 72 percent of political tweets come from people who "strongly disapprove" of the president, while 25 percent of the political tweeters "strongly approve" of the tweeter-in-chief. That means if Trump (and his supporters) feel attacked, it's because they're surrounded by vocal ideological opposites.

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

Original image has been replaced. Credit: Mashable

This dynamic could explain why Twitter is widely known as one of the most combative places on the Internet, a truth that Twitter itself is trying to remedy through efforts to improve "conversational health." If political speech is dominated by only the people who feel "strongly" about our commander-in-chief, that's bound to breed strong takes, and explosive non-debates.

Conversely, the findings also provide statistical support for the idea of Twitter (and social media more generally) as a politicalecho chamber, in particular. About one in five people who don't tweet about national politics said they believe they follow people with the same political views as themselves. However, a higher proportion — 38 percent — of people who do tweet about politics say they follow people with the same political views.

SEE ALSO: Twitter asks researchers to help make site less toxic

Pew studied the accounts, tweets, and self-reported political predilections of 2,427 U.S. adults between June 2018 and June 2019. It had previously found that only 22 percent of U.S. adults are Twitter users, which was surprising given the dominant role that Twitter plays in U.S. politics.

The recent study further confirmed that apparent outsize influence of Twitter on politics. Pew also found that just 13 percent of the tweets it studied were about national politics. Further, only 10 percent of the users who tweeted about politics were responsible for 97 percent of the content. Put another way: 39 percent of twitter users tweeted about politics at least once. But only 10 percent of that 39 percent is responsible for the vast majority of the political tweets on the platform.

Original image has been replaced. Credit: Mashable

Basically, the study shows that a small amount of people are talking a lot of politics, and those people are extremely polarized. No wonder Twitter's most common epithets include "echo chamber" and "cesspool."

Topics Social Media X/Twitter Donald Trump Politics

• Shopping
• Games
• Digital Culture
• Tech
• Social Good
• Deals
• Life
• Science

• Hidden Siri Commands and Unusual Responses
• Jets and Trash by Tao Lin
• Does Lana Del Rey Read The Paris Review? by Sophie Haigney
• Sentences We Loved This Summer by The Paris Review
• Today's Hurdle hints and answers for May 5, 2025
• Head Studies: A Conversation with Jameson Green by Camille Jacobson
• The Action of Love: A Conversation with Charif Shanahan by Morgan Parker
• The Paris Review Wins 2023 Whiting Literary Magazine Prize by The Paris Review
• Best soundbar deal: Save $300 on the Sonos Arc
• Wrong Turn by Natasha Stagg

• Why is Caravaggio so important to Netflix's 'Ripley'?
• Max subscription deal: Get up to 42% off when you prepay for the year
• The M2 MacBook Air is at a new record low price
• OPPO VP Li Kaixin leaves the company · TechNode
• The best wildlife livestreams you need to watch all summer
• Best speaker deal: Get the Ultimate Ears Epicboom portable speaker for $299.99
• How to watch 'Fallout': Release date, streaming deals, and more
• Stand on the surface of an alien planet with NASA
• WPS introduces AI assistant powered by OpenAI LLM for overseas clients · TechNode
• India advises Tesla to copy Apple in pairing Chinese suppliers in India · TechNode

• Mary Shows Up
• August 1–7: What We’re Doing Next Week by The Paris Review
• Diary, 1994–1999 by Dina Nayeri
• Cooking with Elizabeth David by Valerie Stivers
• Best soundbar deal: Save $300 on the Sonos Arc
• Rear Window, Los Feliz by Claudia Ross
• Something Good by Roger Reeves
• Faust and the Risk of Desire by Adam Kirsch
• Best headphones deal: Save up to 51% on Beats at Amazon
• The Bible and Poetry by Michael Edwards

• NYT mini crossword answers for May 9, 2025
• Watch Jessica Laser Read “Kings” at the Paris Review Offices by The Paris Review
• Wrong Turn by Natasha Stagg
• At Chloë’s Closet Sale by Sophie Kemp
• NYT Connections hints and answers for May 10: Tips to solve 'Connections' #699.
• The Playoffs: A Dispatch by Rachel B. Glaser
• The Birder by Maisie Wiltshire
• The Restaurant Review, Summer 2023 by The Paris Review
• Mary Shows Up
• “Then Things Went Bad”: How I Won $264 at Preakness by Tarpley Hitt