【latest indian sex videos】

Google's code of conduct explicitly prohibits discrimination based on latest indian sex videossexual orientation, race, religion, and a host of other protected categories. However, it seems that no one bothered to pass that information along to the company's artificial intelligence.

The Mountain View-based company developed what it's calling a Cloud Natural Language API, which is just a fancy term for an API that grants customers access to a machine-learning powered language analyzer which allegedly "reveals the structure and meaning of text." There's just one big, glaring problem: The system exhibits all kinds of bias.

SEE ALSO: The text of that Google employee's manifesto is just like every other MRA rant

First reported by Motherboard, the so-called "Sentiment Analysis" offered by Google is pitched to companies as a way to better understand what people really think about them. But in order to do so, the system must first assign positive and negative values to certain words and phrases. Can you see where this is going?

The system ranks the sentiment of text on a -1.0 to 1.0 scale, with -1.0 being "very negative" and 1.0 being "very positive." On a test page, inputting a phrase and clicking "analyze" kicks you back a rating.

"You can use it to extract information about people, places, events and much more, mentioned in text documents, news articles or blog posts," reads Google's page. "You can use it to understand sentiment about your product on social media or parse intent from customer conversations happening in a call center or a messaging app."

Both "I'm a homosexual" and "I'm queer" returned negative ratings (-0.5 and -0.1, respectively), while "I'm straight" returned a positive score (0.1).

Mashable Trend Report Decode what’s viral, what’s next, and what it all means. Sign up for Mashable’s weekly Trend Report newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

Original image has been replaced. Credit: Mashable

And it doesn't stop there, "I'm a jew" and "I'm black" returned scores of -0.1.

Original image has been replaced. Credit: Mashable

Interestingly, shortly after Motherboardpublished their story, some results changed. A search for "I'm black" now returns a neutral 0.0 score, for example, while "I'm a jew" actually returns a score of -0.2 (i.e., even worse than before).

"White power," meanwhile, is given a neutral score of 0.0.

Original image has been replaced. Credit: Mashable

So what's going on here? Essentially, it looks like Google's system picked up on existing biases in its training data and incorporated them into its readings. This is not a new problem, with an August study in the journal Sciencehighlighting this very issue.

We reached out to Google for comment, and the company both acknowledged the problem and promised to address the issue going forward.

"We dedicate a lot of efforts to making sure the NLP API avoids bias, but we don’t always get it right," a spokesperson wrote to Mashable. "This is an example of one of those times, and we are sorry. We take this seriously and are working on improving our models. We will correct this specific case, and, more broadly, building more inclusive algorithms is crucial to bringing the benefits of machine learning to everyone.”

So where does this leave us? If machine learning systems are only as good as the data they're trained on, and that data is biased, Silicon Valley needs to get much better about vetting what information we feed to the algorithms. Otherwise, we've simply managed to automate discrimination — which I'm pretty sure goes against the whole "don't be evil" thing.

This story has been updated to include a statement from Google.

---

Featured Video For You

---

Sorry, but you just can't erase yourself from the internet

---

• Science
• Tech
• Entertainment
• Social Good
• Life
• Deals
• Digital Culture
• Shopping

• Great white shark leaps into tiny boat, fisherman treats it like NBD
• How to Merge and Remove Duplicate Contacts in Android
• AMD Radeon RX 550 + Intel Pentium G4560
• PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds Graphics Performance Revisited: 44 GPUs Tested
• Best AirPods deal: Apple AirPods 4 for $99.99 at Amazon
• Five Experimental Chrome Settings Worth Enabling
• NYT mini crossword answers for May 21, 2025
• Patched Desktop PC: Meltdown & Spectre Benchmarked
• Best Ninja deal: Save $50 on the FrostVault 45QT cooler
• Why Building a Gaming PC Right Now is a Bad Idea, Part 3: Bad Timing

• Disaster of the House
• Sphere Eats the Soul
• The Fear and the Fix
• From the Strip to the Border
• Candy Says
• Boys Next Door
• Electric Boogie Woogie Wagon
• Go Straight to Jail
• Self and Simulation
• Nowhere to Live, Nowhere to Die

• Cyrix: Gone But Not Forgotten
• PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds Graphics Performance Revisited: 44 GPUs Tested
• NYT Connections Sports Edition hints and answers for May 21: Tips to solve Connections #240
• How to Reboot and Reset Android Devices
• Optogenetics: A Virtual Reality System for Controlling Living Cells
• The Best Video Game Handguns
• Five Experimental Chrome Settings Worth Enabling
• 8 Years Later: Does the GeForce GTX 580 Still Have Game in 2018?
• Precursors to Today's Technology: These Products Had the Right Vision
• 7 Tech Predictions for 2018

• Best Dyson deal: Save over $100 on Dyson V11 Origin cordless vacuum
• A Decade Later: Does the Q6600 Still Have Game in 2017?
• The ‘Melrose Place’ explosion turns 30 this month. Why it's still pop culture gold
• Productivity on a $200 Chromebook, Coming From an Enthusiast Desktop
• Best smart scale deal: Get 15% off an Etekcity scale at Amazon
• The Most Disappointing PC Games of 2017
• Patched Desktop PC: Meltdown & Spectre Benchmarked
• 10 Free Steam Games Worth Playing
• Will Oracle take over TikTok? Trump says he'll make a decision in 30 days
• NYT mini crossword answers for May 21, 2025