Is ransomware still ransomware if its goal is pornographic eroticism and sexual grotesqueriepurely to destroy?
This is less if-a-tree-falls hypothetical and more sobering reality for the untold number of people across the globe whose computer systems have been infected with the NotPetya ransomware. That's because the latest digital scourge to cripple computer networks in 65 countries (and counting) doesn't fit the typical ransomware mold.
Instead of just encrypting users' files and holding those files ransom, NotPetya appears to do permanent damage to computer systems.
SEE ALSO: A new ransomware is sweeping the globe, but there's a vaccineSecurity researcher Matt Suiche lays out the bad news in a blog post for cybersecurity firm Comae Technologies. He notes that while an earlier version of Petya, from which NotPetya gets its name, technically allowed for the decryption of files, NotPetya doesn't.
"2016 Petya modifies the disk in a way where it can actually revert its changes," writes Suiche. "Whereas, 2017 Petya does permanent and irreversible damages to the disk."
Suiche goes on to call NotPetya a "wiper," and explains the difference between a wiper and ransomware.
"The goal of a wiper is to destroy and damage," notes Suiche. "The goal of a ransomware is to make money. Different intent. Different motive. Different narrative. A ransomware has the ability to restore its modification such as [restoring the MBR like in the 2016 Petya, or decrypting files if the victim pays]— a wiper would simply destroy and exclude possibilities of restoration."
So, if the motive for the malicious code is not profit via a Bitcoin ransom, what could it be? While at this point it's pure speculation, the growing consensus among a host of security experts is that the attack was not launched by cybercriminals in the traditional sense.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
However, not everyone agrees with Suiche's findings. The (now famous) security researcher who discovered the WannaCry kill switch, Marcus Hutchins, takes issue with Suiche's claim that "the current version of Petya clearly got rewritten to be a wiper and not a[n] actual ransomware."
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
But even if the intent hadn't been to destroy, there's almost zero chance those affected by NotPetya could get their data back by paying the $300-worth-of-Bitcoin ransom for a decryption key. That's because the email used to coordinate ransom payments was disabled by the email service provider.
In other words, Suiche's findings reveal a bad situation to be even worse. And, if his discovery portends a new type of ransomware-disguised wipers, the news just went from worse to downright awful.
Topics Cybersecurity
Why drones are a gameElmo's wellness check turned into a mass online trauma dumpWhat Lies Beyond the Red Earth? by Michael SaluAnnouncing Our Fall Issue by Emily StokesIn the Spin Room: At the Republican Debate by Antonia HitchensAn Excerpt from our Art of Poetry Interview with Louise Glück by Henri ColePolestar 4 is now available in Europe and AustraliaSummer by Kate ZambrenoPostcards from Elizabeth Bishop by Langdon HammerNYT's The Mini crossword answers for February 2Review: 'Orion and the Dark' is here to soothe your anxietyDirty Brown Subaru Outback by Kelan NeeBeginning with Color: An Interview with Etel Adnan by Laure AdlerApartment Four by Jacqueline Feldman’88 Toyota Celica by Sam AxelrodSorry, y'all. SpaceX isn't going to Mars in 2018Tech and cash is not enough when it comes to health and climate changeApple's Vision Pro will launch with 600 new appsThe United Arab Emirates wants to build a city on MarsYouTuber creates 20 Adam Scott, Lena Dunham, and more celebs auction off random experiences to help strike New Lovers: A Publisher’s Quest to Redefine Erotica All the things I can't do because my MacBook's spacebar is broken Best Garmin deal: Garmin epix smartwatch on sale for $200 off Notre Dame vs Central Michigan livestream: How to watch live, kickoff time The iPhone 15 Pro is faster, but not by much How a Tchotchke Became a Family Heirloom, of Sorts Stay put while exploring the White House holiday decorations on Google Maps Three Millennia Later, Scholars Still Struggle with Sappho Ghostly Beauty: Anna Atkins, the First Woman to Take a Photo Ron Arad’s Haunting, Flattened Cars Remind of J. G. Ballard Colin Barrett Talks About His Approach to the Short Story Remembering Freddy Plimpton Google commits to 10 years of Chromebook updates to extend device lifespan Photos of 19th Century Alaska Rediscovered Under a Porch Staff Picks: Silvina Ocampo, Gary Shteyngart, Brian Turner Neil Diamond, Longfellow, and Ridicule Avoid This Book: The History and Romance of Elastic Webbing Staff Picks: Walser, Verhoeven, Lead Belly, and More Best speakers deal: Get portable speakers for up to 28% off, including JBL and Sony
3.4118s , 10194.1328125 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【pornographic eroticism and sexual grotesquerie】,Miracle Information Network