Some Facebook users who recently watched a Daily Mailvideo depicting Black men reported seeing a label from Facebook asking if they were interested in watching more videos about "primates."
The Watch Lonely Wives Club 3 Onlinelabel appeared in bold text under the video, stating "Keep seeing videos about Primates?" next to "Yes" and "Dismiss" buttons that users could click to answer the prompt. It's part of an AI-powered Facebook process that attempts to gather information on users' personal interests in order to deliver relevant content into their News Feed.
The video in question showed several instances of white men calling the police on Black men and the resulting events, and had nothing to do with primates. Facebook issued an apology, telling the New York Timesthat it was an "unacceptable error" and that it was looking into ways to prevent this happening in the future.
The label came to Facebook's attention when Darci Groves, a former Facebook content design manager, posted it to a product feedback forum for current and former Facebook employees and shared it on Twitter. Groves said that a friend came across the label and screenshotted and shared it with her.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
The offensive label feels particularly unacceptable considering the extremely expansive database of user-uploaded photos that Facebook has access to, and could presumably use to ensure proper facial recognition by its tools. While AI can always make mistakes, it is the company's responsibility to properly train its algorithms, and this misstep cannot be blamed on a lack of resources.
In addition to mishandling past racial justice issues within the company, Facebook's lack of transparent plan to address its AI problem continues to sow distrust. While the apology was needed, the company's lack of apparent actionable steps beyond disabling the feature and a vague promise to "prevent this from happening again" doesn't cut it.
SEE ALSO: Facebook buried an earlier report on popular posts. So much for transparency.The approach is especially lackluster following Facebook's recent move to cut off researchers' access to tools and accounts used to explore user data and ad activity on the platform, citing possible violation of a settlement with the Federal Trade Commission. The FTC has directly disputed that defense.
Combining a vague response with decreased access to facts makes it rather hard to simply trust that Facebook will handle this inappropriate AI gaffe with any kind of immediacy or results. If Facebook is committed to creating and using AI tools in an inclusive manner, it needs to specify exactly how it plans to fix this issue, and it needs to do so soon.
Topics Facebook
Fake Meat, Real Profits
Vision Pro apps are now visible on Apple's App Store website
This pollinating bee drone shows the power of these endangered creatures
Toyota Yaris by Sarah Miller
Why Clerks Still Works
Announcing Our Winter Issue by Emily Stokes
Six Photos from W. G. Sebald’s Albums by Nick Warr
Announcing Our Winter Issue by Emily Stokes
Mister Politician Man
In Remembrance of Louise Glück by Srikanth Reddy
Class Struggles
Summer by Kate Zambreno
The most exciting (and underwhelming) reveals from the PlayStation State of Play stream
Lifesize Dioramas: At Carolee Schneemann's House by Hannah Gold
Regulators! Stand Back
W Stands for W by Stephen Haines
W Stands for W by Stephen Haines
A man with a nasty habit of suing the EPA now leads it, because why not?
Runaway American Dreams
Hulu and ESPN+ will crack down on password sharing, following Disney+
Facebook fined £500K for 'serious breaches' of data protection lawTeen keeps it super real in hysterical makeup tutorialTeen keeps it super real in hysterical makeup tutorialFacebook's Ads Archive Report reveals the top political spendersFacebook's Ads Archive Report reveals the top political spenders'Devil May Cry 5' bundle costs $8,000, which is honestly stupidDads find doppelgängers in airport and become fast dad friends'Devil May Cry 5' bundle costs $8,000, which is honestly stupidMeryl Streep and Hugh Grant's Reddit AMA was hilariously BritishTwitter briefly locked Elon Musk's account but it's back nowYour favorite rapper Kevin Hart signs to Motown RecordsPolice hunt for man who kinda looks like Ross from 'Friends'Qualcomm's new audio chip will fuel an explosion of Alexa headphonesYour favorite rapper Kevin Hart signs to Motown RecordsGoogle now lets you change privacy settings in Search itselfItalian government fines Apple and Samsung for performance throttlingNot the gold medal winner: Twitter gets the wrong Kyle ChalmersCathay Pacific hit with data breach involving 9.4 million customersReddit partners with Patreon to offer up a special flair, put a focus on creator communitiesWe're getting free tacos thanks to a stolen base at the World Series Books, Crime, and Punishment! by The Paris Review Reading Dogs, Biblical Judges, Myers Return Engagement: An Interview with Rebecca Gates by Peter Terzian 'Succession' Season 4: How does episode 9 set up the show's grand finale? *That* Chadwick Boseman tweet is now Twitter's 'most Liked' ever Wordle today: Here's the answer and hints for May 22 Jean Toomer’s “Beehive” by Rachel Kaadzi Ghansah What Books Should I Read to Impress a Guy? by Margaux Williamson Wharton Erotica, Peculiar Pulp, Encyclopedia Brown by Sadie Stein This Side of Paradise by Rachael Maddux Phillip’s Dry Cleaners by Amie Barrodale Sacred Texts, Caravaggio, and Some Pigs by Sadie Stein Gloriana by Kevin Huizenga TPR vs. High Times: Smoke ’Em If You Got ’Em by Cody Wiewandt TPR Softball: Failure’s No Success at All by Cody Wiewandt 'Hope this email finds you well' meme is painfully accurate Introducing Our Summer Issue! by The Paris Review WhatsApp finally lets you edit messages, but you have to be fast Code 451, Psychotic Real Estate by Sadie Stein What We’re Loving: Giant Dollhouses, Literary Art, Sade by The Paris Review
1.7342s , 8217.3828125 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【Watch Lonely Wives Club 3 Online】,Miracle Information Network