Moviegoers aren't happy with mother!020 Archives but not necessarily because they think it's bad.
Writer/director Darren Aronofsky's latest earned an F from CinemaScore. It's rare to see such a low grade from the Las Vegas-based audience polling firm, but when it does happen it's usually because of a marketing fail rather than a creative fail (though sometimes it isjust because a movie is that bad).
SEE ALSO: Even Jennifer Lawrence thought 'mother!' maybe took things 'too far'In the case of mother!, as Mashable's Angie Han has already pointed out, it's not the "haunted house horror" that trailers suggest. In actuality, it's much "stranger and more ambitious."
Unfortunately for mother!, there's little room for nuance in CinemaScore grading. A 2016 interview in the Las Vegas Review-Journal with Ed Mintz, the firm's founder, clarifies what the letter grades generally equate to for a new movie's overall quality and business outlook.
"A’s generally are good, B’s generally are shaky, and C’s are terrible," he explained. "D’s and F’s, they shouldn’t have made the movie, or they promoted it funny and the absolute wrong crowd got into it."
That latter point is likely the case with mother!, which has gotten a largely positive reception from critics. As Angie wrote in her review:
"Some people will come away bowled over by its ambitions and artistry. Many will be annoyed to discover it's not the film the trailer is selling. Still others will react with ambivalence. All of those people will leave the theater wanting to talk about it afterward."
Topics Film
Norwegian paper publishes spectacularly viral Donald Trump burnWhite House site security error is more 'embarrassing' than worryingELLE's new video challenging gender stereotypes is going viral for all the right reasonsApple iPhone SE to be 'Designed in California, Assembled in India'PlayStation 4 is finally getting external hard drive supportComcast's huge Trump protest started on SlackTrue love is a guy who gets his girl a bouquet of delicious chicken nuggetsConfessions of a Tinder Tourist: The rules of rightDon't ever try to use 'Harry Potter' against J.K. Rowling in an argumentA family found a rattlesnake in their toilet — then 23 moreMove over, Puppy Bowl: Bunny Bowl is here to outComcast's huge Trump protest started on SlackSamsung Pay to launch in India in first half of 2017Uber offers drivers $1 each to wipe away labor threats valued in the billionsSnapchat's IPO reveals how much it cost to make a man disappearThoughtful dad sends flowers not to his wife, but to his dogLow Power FM radio stations hacked to play explicit antiThis is how millennials are saving moneyThis robot flies like a real bat and is not at all creepyForget telepresence robots on wheels, Google wants telepresence drones Dinner at the End of America by Laura Bannister The Academic’s Guide to Academese Yvan Alagbé’s “Dyaa” Staff Picks: Dorothy, Oz, and Arkansas Sex in the Garden How French Libertines Are Reckoning With #MeToo Martin Luther King's Radical Anticapitalism Aharon Appelfeld: “You cannot be a writer of death” Raising a Glass to Fred Bass, the Strand’s Iconic Owner Mirtha Dermisache and the Limits of Language by Will Fenstermaker The Baby, the Book, and the Bathwater Postcards from the Propaganda Front by Spencer Bokat Trump Disappears up Himself A 1984 Film’s Bleak, Brutal Depiction of Nuclear Winter Still Haunts Today Redux: Amos Oz, May Swenson, Gerard Kornelis van het Reve Redux: Frank O’Hara, Joy Williams, Roberto Bolaño Beyond Harlem: The Other Black Renaissance A Private Literature Ursula K. Le Guin: The Rabble Mark Twain's Get
2.2882s , 8202.7109375 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【2020 Archives】,Miracle Information Network