Instagram is n's view? dress, eroticism, and the ideal female body in athenian art,"chill with the decision it made two years ago to ditch the chronological feed in favor of an algorithm. The older way of showing you your follow list's shares isn't coming back.
Ever since the change, though, the algorithm has been something of a mystery. Shares surface in your feed without any apparent rhyme or reason, and Instagram has kept quiet on exactly how those under-the-hood decisions are made... until now.
SEE ALSO: Here's how an inventive programmer uncovered Instagram's Pride Month featuresDuring a recent media tour at its headquarters in San Francisco, the Facebook-owned company laid out the various factors that are weighed before an Instagram post appears in your personal feed (h/t TechCrunch). It comes down to three primary considerations: Interest, recency, and relationship.
Interest is the most subject to interpretation; the algorithm ranks the posts it might show you based on your past interactions (or lack thereof) with similar content. Recency is, literally, how new the post is; something that's just been shared is more likely to surface than something that was shared weeks ago. Relationship is a measure of your interactions with different accounts, via comments, tagging, and the like.
The algorithm also weighs a trio of secondary considerations when it populates your feed: How often you look at Instagram, with an eye toward showing you the best posts since your last visit; how many people you follow, so you're not seeing the same person's posts all the time if your follow pool is deep; and how much time you typically spend browsing.
Instagram continues to listen to feedback from those wanting to see the chronological feed brought back, but it's not in the company's current plans. The algorithm is here to stay because it works. Users are more engaged, and -- according to Instagram -- they're seeing more posts from their closest follows, be it people or brands, than they did before.
More than that, for all the feedback that's come in around the move to an algorithmic feed, no one criticism has stood out.
"As we’ve dug in more and tried to understand why people ask for chronological, it’s not a universal thing," Instagram feed product lead Julian Gutman told Recode. "It isn’t a single reason that people want chrono, and I think what we’re really trying to understand is what are those different frustrations that people have and how can we build that in to their personalized feed experience."
So there you have it. Whether or not you agree, Instagram's data suggests that the algorithm is giving you a better experience than the chronological feed ever did. And this new push for further transparency seems to be motivated by a desire to spell out exactly how and why that's the case.
Topics Instagram Social Media
Satellite photos show Guatemala's volcanic eruption smother a resortUber is hard at work at offering more than one mode of transportationKanye West updated his album with a lyric referencing slavery commentsCostco food court items, rankedSheryl Sandberg at MIT: 'It's hard knowing that you let people down''Wheel of Fortune Answers' solves puzzles incorrectly and hilariouslyFacebook Messenger is finally going to cut down on troll notificationsWhite House says its federal agencies can’t keep track of their own dataApple finally allows thirdCould planets orbiting Alpha Centauri harbor life?Satellite photos show Guatemala's volcanic eruption smother a resortAmericans aren't sold on the idea of returning astronauts to the moonFacebook's journalism project announcement contains a big typoHands on with Xiaomi Mi 8 Explorer Edition: One cool transparent phoneCongrats to Disney's Cinderella on finally getting earsLOL, wait: The babies featured in Beyoncé and JayHere's how the Apple Watch's new 'walkie talkie' feature worksSteam's troubling postThis possible 'Star Wars' plot hole is tearing the internet in two1,000 people picked up their Boring Company flamethrowers this weekend Participating in the American Theater of Trauma by Patrick Nathan James Alan McPherson’s Powerful, Strangely Frightening Stories by Edward P. Jones Redux: A Creator of Inwardness by The Paris Review What’s the Use of Beauty? by Cody Delistraty A Graphic Novel before the Term Existed by James Sturm What We Deserve by Angie Cruz Redux: A Heat That Hung Like Rain by The Paris Review Iris Murdoch’s Gayest Novel by Garth Greenwell The Aesthetic Beauty of Math by Karen Olsson The Birth of the Semicolon by Cecelia Watson On the Eve of My Eternal Marking by Jenny Boully Redux: Water Promises Joy and Fear by The Paris Review The Ordinary Woman Theory by Caitlin Horrocks Always the Model, Never the Artist by Madison Mainwaring Staff Picks: Ballet, Bob Dylan, and Black Smudges by The Paris Review What Thom Gunn Thought of Oliver Sacks by Lawrence Weschler Translation as an Arithmetic of Loss by Ingrid Rojas Contreras Natalia Ginzburg’s Broken Mirror by Tim Parks Summer is Made of the Memory of Summer by Nina MacLaughlin Redux: The Thread of the Story by The Paris Review
1.7103s , 10194.28125 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【n's view? dress, eroticism, and the ideal female body in athenian art,"】,Miracle Information Network