【Secret Confessions: Tubong Lugaw Episode 47】

President Trump may have Secret Confessions: Tubong Lugaw Episode 47just dramatically slashed the size of two national monuments in Utah, but America's 59 national parks -- as well as over 270 other national park sites -- cannot be unilaterally downsized by Trump or any other president.

The legal reason is simple and inarguable:

"National parks can only be established by Congress, and everyone agrees they can only be undone, if at all, by Congress," Holly Doremus, a natural resources law expert at University of California, Berkeley, told Mashablein an email.

SEE ALSO: Photos of the majestic public lands Trump just opened to drilling and hunting

National monuments -- like Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante -- are a different story. Combined, Trump reduced both protected lands by nearly 2 million acres combined. Bears Ears was reduced in size by over 80 percent.

Unlike national parks or other national park sites -- places like national rivers, national preserves, and national seashores -- national monuments are established by the president, who wields the unilateral power to protect places of historic or scientific interest from resource extraction and development. This presidential power is granted by the 1906 Antiquities Act and was first employed by the conservation-minded president Theodore Roosevelt to establish Devils Tower National Monument in Wyoming, also in 1906.

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

But while presidents can establish a national monument, it's doubtful -- though still arguable-- they can change monument boundaries, like Congress can. Because the Trump administration just did this, they have now entered murky legal territory.

"Congress can certainly undo a national monument designation," said Doremus. "It is disputed whether the president can unilaterally do so. Most natural resource scholars think not."

Original image has been replaced. Credit: Mashable

A review of the matter, published earlier this year by two natural resource lawyers in The Virginia Law Review, supports this belief. They argue that only Congress has the power to "downsize" a national monument, just like only Congress can nix or dissolve a national monument. They write:

If the President cannot abolish a national monument because Congress did not delegate that authority to the President, it follows that the President also lacks the power to downsize or loosen the protections afforded to a monument.

Still, no president has ever cut the boundaries of a national monument to such an extreme degree and then been challenged in court. The authors add:

Importantly though, no Presidential decision to reduce the size of a national monument has ever been tested in court, and so no court has ever ruled on the legality of such an action.

Until this gets settled, it's possible the Trump administration will alter or downsize other national monuments. In a once-secret memo given to the president in August, Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke recommended that four national monuments be downsized and six others altered.

National monuments like Bears Ears are not protected on a president's whim: They are typically reviewed for years and seek public input to confirm their natural and cultural significance, as President Obama articulated in December 2016:

"Following years of public input and various proposals to protect both of these areas, including legislation and a proposal from tribal governments in and around Utah, these monuments will protect places that a wide range of stakeholders all agree are worthy of protection."

---

Featured Video For You

---

A floating 'island of trash' has surfaced in the Caribbean

---

• Social Good
• Games
• Entertainment
• Deals
• Tech
• Science
• Life
• Shopping

• The Opioid Thief
• The View from Warsaw
• Popular and Known to No One
• The Man Who Writes Newspaper Articles While The Trees Disappear And No One Listens
• Dublin in My Tears
• Imperfect Voices
• The Dunce Party
• Never Gonna Give You Up
• Period Feminism
• Consciously Uncontracting

• The NBA doesn't want teams roasting each other on social media anymore
• A bunch of people bought shares in a company that they thought was Snapchat
• NBA becomes first sports league to create a gaming league
• Riverdale recap: Episode 3 smashes the patriarchy
• Miranda Kerr to Facebook: 'How do they sleep at night?'
• Former NSA contractor accused of stealing top secret documents says he was just a hoarder
• Google brings virtual reality directly to your web browser
• Astronaut captures clearest footage yet of rare type of lightning
• To regain advertiser trust, Facebook is tracking ads by the millisecond
• Critics heap praise upon 'Fifty Shades Darker'

• A Telling Moment
• Robert Moses is Dead
• Psychocandy I Milo Nesbitt
• Cruel and Unusual Nourishment
• Let’s Do It, Pruitt!
• What Makes Foreign Policy “Feminist”?
• The Almighty Gun
• Volutions
• Stormbound
• The Art of Propaganda

• Engineered for Dystopia
• El Alto Chronicles
• Let Us Prey
• Going Beyond the Law
• The Trash of the System
• True Colors
• Fresh Hell
• Raging for the World That Is
• You Know You Want It
• East Berlin Stories